A Philosophy of Life
 

Mahayana Buddhist philosophy, and Zen Buddhist philosophy, both complement REBT/CENT very well, and help to calm the mind of the client.

"Yesterday is a cancelled cheque; tomorrow is a promisory note; today is the only cash you have - so spend it wisely".

Kay Lyons

~~~

A PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE

Some people think of philosophy as airy-fairy waffle that is of no interest to anybody but academics and pretentious buffoons. Nothing could be further from the truth. Each of us lives our life from an unconscious philosophy of life - a blueprint that we follow like Pavlov's dogs. Unless and until we make that philosophy conscious (insofar as that is possible!), and change it so that it serves us instead of defeating us, we will be the pawns of those who trained our current philosophy of life into us.

On this website you will find elements of philosophy which can begin the process of liberating you from the chains of an excessively restrictive philosophy of life. Increasingly in the future, you will also find elements of moral philosophy that are designed to tackle the post-liberation event with guidance on how to live a productive pro-social life, in harmony with others, and in just institutions, without which there cannot be a harmonious society.

Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) is the original and, it seems to me, the most thoroughgoing form of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, and can be approached as a short-term palliative when you are feeling overly-upset emotions; or it can be approached as a way of life, based on a profound philosophy which was drawn in part from the history of philosophy by Dr Albert Ellis.  It benefits from admixing with some other philosophies, which is tackled within Cognitive Emotive Narrative Therapy (CENT), which is explained elsewhere on this website.

Most helpful philosophies trace their roots back to the distant past, in the philosophies of ancient India, China, etc; and ancient Greece and Rome. The Buddhist view of how to avoid becoming overly upset - which dates back 2,500 years - is to avoid "attachment"; which in many ways is similar to the REBT concept of "demandingness", or insisting that things continue to be the (good) way that they are (or were), and that other things should not become the (bad) way that they could become. The Stoic view is that "control" is the problem. When we try to control the uncontrollable, we end up in emotional misery.  

The trick to Stoicism is to teach yourself how to distingusih the controllable from the uncontrollable aspects of you environment/life. Again, this is similar to the REBT view of "acceptance" of self, others and the world, just the way they are. It is also similar to the 'est' view of the importance of accepting 'what is so'.  

About 2,500 years ago, a young prince by the name of Siddhartha Gautama, at the age of 29 years, left his palatial home to wander the world in search of an answer to human suffering. 

He spent at least eight years in this mode, questioning existing wise individuals, and practicing various ascetic practices. Eventually he took up a form of meditation, and sat down one evening with the intention of not rising from meditation until he understood the nature of, and the solution to, the problem of human suffering. (He was not a religious seeker, but a seeker after personal and general human liberation from suffering). After many days of meditation, during which he became emaciated, he eventually reached ‘enlightenment’ – a mental state of liberation from suffering. He arose from his meditation, and went about the process of how to communicate his learning to others. This took some time. 

At first he tried non-verbal means of communicating what he had learned, but in time a verbal form of communication was developed. The Four Noble Truths that thus arose were as follows:

1. Life is suffering, for all humans. Life is difficult, frustrating and bedevilled by difficulty and problems (some but not all of the time).

2. The source of suffering is Desire. Suffering is caused by desiring the unattainable.

3. The solution to all human suffering is to give up desiring the unattainable. To give up wanting more and more. To give up the appetites of greed, envy, lust, and the resulting emotions of anger, anxiety, hurt, and so on.

4. Part of the road to mastering the giving up of desire is to focus upon the “emptiness” of life, in the process of meditation; and to focus upon generating compassion for others instead of generating comfort for ourselves.

This philosophy of the Buddha, as Siddhartha became known, has influenced many other systems of thought. It was transported to China where it blended with Taoism to form Chan Buddhism; and from there to Japan, where it became Zen Buddhism: one of the most elegant systems of mental liberation in my view.

Some of the Ancient Greek philosophers were also aware of the need to curb our appetites for excessive pleasure, especially Epicurus and his followers, who removed themselves from Athens and went into the countryside to live in a simple agricultural commune in order to escape the madness of city life.

The Stoics also saw the advantages of the simple life; the life of service rather than grasping; the importance of reconciliation with whatever is the case in one’s life; instead of demanding that life should always be easy.

Many of these philosophies influenced Albert Ellis, when, in 1955-62, he created Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT). REBT teaches that it is primarily excessive grasping, or demandingness, that results in every overly-upset emotion. However, unlike the Buddha, REBT thinks that desiring the attainable or the reasonable goal is valid and not likely to result in overly-upset emotions. Of course, dashed hopes of achieving some goal will almost inevitably result in disappointment, sadness and so on. These emotions are called, in REBT, “reasonable upsets”, or reasonably acceptable levels of upset when our goals are thwarted. REBT, unlike the Buddha, does not advocate that you give up your reasonable goals, or that you must focus your attention on compassion for others. It seems reasonable to assume that if you have a good balance of personal goals and social goals, and are realistic about your chances of achieving them, you will not overly upset yourself when you fail to achieve them, nor alienate yourself from your social group by anti-social behaviour. The "trick", in REBT, is to learn to distinguish between when you are being demanding and when you are only desiring something. Demandingness will almost always get you into trouble, emotionally and behavioural; while desiring that your reasonable goals be achieved will not normally overly upset you when they are thwarted.

If you are currently feeling angry, anxious or depressed, or experiencing behavioural problems in your relationships at home or at work, then you can get help by going here:

Face-to-face coaching, counselling and therapy services in Hebden Bridge and Halifax, West Yorkshire, UK.

Or:

Long-distance coaching, counselling and therapy services, anywhere in the world, over the telephone system, or over the internet.

Or telephone Jim Byrne on 01422 847 882 (from inside the UK); or on 44 1422 847 882 (from outside the UK).

Or email Jim Byrne at ABC Coaching and Counselling Services.

Finally, if you want to see an inspiring piece of video that could help to change your attitude towards life, then please take a look at The Simple Truth.

~~~

AN IMPORTANT POSTSCRIPT - 18th May 2009

It seemed to me for quite a long time that I had this philosophy pretty well sewn up. Then I hit a major problem with my website, which had serious financial implications for me and my family. Then I felt very stressed, and posted a note to that effect at Facebook, for my friends and relations to see. it was meant to be a statement of Stoical coping with a difficult situation, but it did not come out quite like that.

A friend contacted me about my message to hope that I would not long have to suffer, even if I happen to be particularly resilient. That started me thinking, and the strands of my thoughts are revealed in the following Facebook message that I sent back to my friend:

MESSAGE TO A SYMPATHETIC FRIEND

Dear Friend,

Thank you for your concern and good wishes. When I wrote that ‘Life is very, …very, difficult. Tough stuff!’, I though I was making an empowering philosophical statement. What happened was that my old website crashed, decimating my online business, with significant financial implications for me. My new website had not taken off, and is still difficult for anybody to find. And so I am stalled in terms of my aim of reaching out to help people, and of earning a living over the internet. However, I was trying to be Stoical about my loss, and to avoid getting overly upset about it. I thought I was succeeding valiantly.

When you responded, I could see that my communication was more ambiguous than I had intended; and that there was more to this statement that I had made than originally met my eye.

It is in fact a restatement of the original insight of the Buddha Gautama, who famously said ‘Life is suffering’. However, until you responded, I had not made the connection that this was his ‘starting point’, and not his ‘eventual discovery’.

After 16 years of inquiry, study and meditation, the Buddha concluded with a second insight, which is:

“Life is without difficulty, provided you avoid picking and choosing”.

And that was what I was doing. I was reasonably upset because I was choosing that my business not have been decimated, when it had. I was resisting reality.

Your message woke me up to that oversight on my part. I would now prefer to say:

“Even though my internet business has all but collapsed, I insist on refraining from picking and choosing. I accept this outcome, and will try to rectify it in the midterm future”.

That seems like a more deserving utterance for the claim of making an empowering philosophical statement. I accept the things I cannot change, and commit myself to change the things I can, right now, and as I proceed into the next moment, and the next, and the next.

Thank you for your kind words, and for waking me up to my sloppy thinking.

~~~

PART TWO

I then went on to remind myself that the Buddha had a third and fourth insight, as follows:

Third: That life is both difficult and non-difficult. That is to say, it has good bits and bad bits, or easy bits and difficult bits, or painful and pleasant bits. Not either/or, but both/and, as it was eventually expressed in European philosophy.

Fourth: That life is neither difficult nor non-difficult, because “difficult” and “non-difficult” are just sounds in the air; concepts; words; and we err when we mistake such statements for “reality”. This is the transcendent position.

From this meditation, I created the image of myself as living in a small, square hut, with four windows: one in each wall. If I look through window number one, I see the words on the frame that say: Life is difficult; and as I look outside, I see the wreckage of my website business, and I lament the mess that has transpired.

When I turn 90% to my right, towards the second window, I see these words on the frame: Life is without difficulty, provided we avoid picking and choosing. Looking out this window I see all the potentially good and bad elements of my life today, and yesterday, and I refuse to pick and choose between them; I refuse to wish for the scene to be some particular way. I stand outside of the scene and am detached from it.

Then I turn to the third window, and see these words on the frame: Life is both good and bad, with suffering and pleasure within it. If I accept this ‘framing’, then I see the good bits of my life as compensations for the bad bits, and I am calmed. I don’t try to get rid of the bad bits, but I also do not over-generalise from the bad bits to the whole thing.

Finally, I turn to the fourth window and see these words on the frame: Life is neither good nor bad, as these are just word labels (or nominalism). This is a liberating perspective. I do not try to think about it any further, as my thinking would involve evaluations and labellings. I just silently enjoy the sight from this fourth window. Nothing outside has any name!

That’s what I got from your response, so thank you for stimulating this insight!

Best wishes,
Jim

~~~

"Most people think that external life will give them what they crave and seek... Life comes in as impressions and it is here that it is possible to work on oneself... No one can transform external life. But anyone can transform their impressions".

Maurice Nicoll

~~~

Tony Curtis (of Hollywood fame) has recently been dispensing some (quite good) wise words, at the age of 83 years. So why not Baz Luhrmann, in the video clip that follows? Try it and see. I like to balance the see-saw against the "hard science-ists", who believe in the possibility of some absolute truth through experimentation!

~~~

"Meditation is not primarily a cognitive distraction.  It is a living experience of moments of silence, stillness and calm serenity.  As such, it accumulates over time, if practiced regularly, and provides a central core of calmness to the individual; an ability to feel at peace in the storm of our crazy world".  Jim Byrne, May 2009.